pushed, thanks
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Amos Waterland wrote:

Do not override the caller's wishes regarding waiting for smp function
call completion. I was being too conservative in this respect: the lock protects the call_data structure, and the function called is expected to
be threadsafe.

Signed-off-by: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

 smp.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff -r a8e67a19c325 xen/arch/powerpc/smp.c
--- a/xen/arch/powerpc/smp.c    Tue Nov 28 10:33:53 2006 -0500
+++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/smp.c    Tue Nov 28 16:28:10 2006 -0500
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int on_selected_cpus(
     call_data.func = func;
     call_data.info = info;
     call_data.wait = wait;
-    call_data.wait = 1;  /* Until we get RCU around call_data.  */
     atomic_set(&call_data.started, 0);
     atomic_set(&call_data.finished, 0);
     mb();

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

Reply via email to