On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Jerone Young wrote:
Sorry guys. Please ignore this patch. I found a bug with it. Will
submit
a fixed version shortly.
Ok, took a peek though and it seems that not all xencomm_map*() calls
have there return values checked.
Using ENOSPC for the errno for xencomm_map_no_alloc() seems
inappropriate, since it ENOSPC is really about devices. ENOMEM is
not right because we are not trying to allocate. I do not think
anything fits perfectly, but I'd go with EINVAL because argsize is
simply to big and an invalid argument.
Thoughts?
-JX
_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
