Hollis Blanchard wrote: > I can't just ifdef PowerPC's xc_linux_build back in, because libelf > doesn't map page-by-page like the old ELF loader did. That means I need > to pre-map the memory, which starts dragging in xc_dom infrastructure.
You don't need more xc_dom infrastructure, I've tried to make the libelf bits independant of the xc_dom stoff for exactly that reason. Have a look at the hvm loader (xc_hvm_build.c). It uses libelf too, it has a loadelfimage() which maps the memory, calls elf_load_binary, unmaps again. You could do that too. Oh, and an example of page-by-page loading using libelf is in xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c. > What is the difference between dom->shadow_enable and > xc_dom_feature_translated()? It's identical now I think. In the early days (before split-off elf handling code to libelf) I've tried to use the new domain builder for hvm too, the logic whevener pfn->mfn translation is needed was a bit more complex than just looking up shadow_enabled. HTH, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xenfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel