On Jul 9, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 20:26 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 9/7/07 20:20, "Hollis Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

By the way, I wonder how PPC manages to build both drivers/char/ mem.c and drivers/xen/char/mem.c without ARCH_HAS_DEV_MEM? The model is supposed to be that mem_fops defined by the Xen file is picked up by the generic file. If !ARCH_HAS_DEV_MEM then that doesn't happen -- so who picks up the Xen

Hmmm, yeah. Looks like we haven't tested that... :)

yeah, we have :)
xlate_dev_mem_ptr() works just fine for us, so drivers/char/mem.c just works and the xen version of the ops is never considered.

Actually we should be forcing CONFIG_XEN_DEVMEM, but the Makefile ignores it.

Xen-ppc-devel mailing list

Reply via email to