On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Dor Laor wrote:
> > On 11/08/2010 04:55 AM, M A Young wrote:
> >>
> >> What do others think about this? For example is it achievable as a
> >> feature, is it too early and better to wait for F16, and what else should
> >> we aim to do to make xen usable in Fedora?
> >>      
> > Have you consider kvm? it's upstream since 2.6.20 and now its more ready
> > than ever.
> >    
> There are some good tutorials which should explain the difference 
> between xen and kvm, particularly the performance and hardware 
> requirements of each.

In any case, the question of whether KVM or Xen is best, is not really
relevant to whether Xen Dom0 has a place in F15. Fedora will welcome any 
software that meets the packaging & licensing guidelines, and has someone
who is willing to maintain it. So if people want to maintain Xen as an
alternative virtualization option in Fedora, they're welcome todo so.
KVM will of course remain the default virt host setup offered in the 

|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
xen mailing list

Reply via email to