On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Digimer <li...@alteeve.com> wrote:
> On 10-11-09 11:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> AFAIK there are some issues with that benchmark not being free.
>> What I'm basically looking for is a simple comparison of a few key metrics
>> between common setups. For example a simple bonnie++ run on XenPV and
>> KVM+virtio_blk could already give people at least some baseline numbers.
> I'd be happy to run some benchmarks. I've got some identical (if humble)
> machines... Would you want just a Xen vs. KVM? If so, what parameters or
> setup options would provide the best apples to apples comparison?
> The machines are;
> - quad core athlon II x4
> - 4gb ddr3
> - 1x 7200rom 500GB drive
> - Fedora 14, stripped (but identical) installs
> If these are too low end for useful results, let me know. Otherwise,
> I'll fire up Xen under Michael's 2.6.32-25-172 kernel with the stock
> 4.0.1 hypervisor on one machine, and can use the stock KVM/QEMU setup
> for another.
> Assuming all is fine, would it matter whether the VMs were F14 vs CentOS
> I was thinking 3x runs each of;
> - bonnie++
> - Recompile Michael's kernel
> - ?? Please make suggestions
There is also an ongoing discussion about Xen vs. KVM performance on
the CentOS virt list
xen mailing list