On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:27:08PM -0400, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
>    On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>    <[1]konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
>      Hey,
>      There has been some discussion about EFI and SecureBoot and such.
>      Most of the time I get questions in the form of "How do I get Fedora 17
>      with Xen to do EFI", I am going to concentrate on Fedora, but I think
>      this applies to other distros too.
>      From my reading (I hadn't actually tried EFI yet), there are two ways
>      to bootup a system:
>       - Using grub2.efi. Grub2 does the EFI API calls and calls the Xen
>      hypervisor
>         as if there were no EFI. This means no need for the EFI calls from
>         Linux or Xen are required).
>       - Using xen.efi. Xen can be built as a PE (Portable Executable) and it
>      can
>         boot as an EFI image. Naturally you also need to provide a
>      configuration
>         file and here are the details on it:
>         [2]http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/efi.html
>         And you would also need to configure the EFI nvram to execute xen.efi
>         instead of grub2.efi.
>         For the Linux side, the kernel needs to make new EFI variant
>      hypercalls.
>         Currently the SLES kernel is capable of it. The upstream Linux kernel
>         cannot do it. There were patches proposed for it:
>         [3]http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg02027.html
>    Does the Linux side dom0 kernel changes need to be done irrespective of
>    the
>    two options above ? or does it apply only for booting with xen.efi ?
>    I spent a week trying to get Xen boot with grub2.efi (ubuntu 12.04).
>    I ended up getting "Not enough memory to relocate domain 0".
>    So I presume that the dom0 kernel EFI support needs to be done for both
>    cases (grub2.efi and xen.efi) ?
>    Additional info:
>     Hardware: IBM System X server.
>     It appeared that when booting xen under grub2.efi, xen was picking up a
>    e-801 map
>     instead of the e-820 map that was on the system. I forced xen code to a
>    multiboot
>     e-820 map instead of the native one ( based on a forum post I saw).
>     That didnt help much.

There have been also other reports about this EFI e801 issue here on xen-devel 

-- Pasi

>    So I ended up booting with a SLES kernel. Not even sure if opensuse 12.1
>    will work.
>         which were mostly ports of how SLES did it (And they should reflect
>         the proper ownership, which they don't have right now).
>         The EFI maintainer (Matthew) commented
>         [4]http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg00815.html
>         that he would like a better abstraction model for it. Mainly to
>         push those calls deeper down (so introduce the registration in the
>         the efi_calls). Or perhaps by providing in
>      boot_params.efi_info.efi_systab
>         a finely crafted structure pointing to Linux functions that would
>         do the hypercalls.
>      And there you have it. In other words it needs somebody willing to
>      look at the patches as a baseline and do some exciting new work.
>      I sadly don't have right now the time to address this :-(
>      _______________________________________________
>      Xen-devel mailing list
>      [5]xen-de...@lists.xen.org
>      [6]http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> References
>    Visible links
>    1. mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com
>    2. http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/efi.html
>    3. http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg02027.html
>    4. http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg00815.html
>    5. mailto:xen-de...@lists.xen.org
>    6. http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

xen mailing list

Reply via email to