Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > But this raised the question to me again if we really need the "xenomai" > > prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not doing the > > same linking dance for the other skins as well? Or do you also prefer > > that user include <xenomai/native/task.h> instead of just <native/task.h>? > > We need this for building from within the kernel. Other options would > require to either alter the Xenomai source tree adding symlinks there, > pollute linux/include with symlinks to reach the individual Xeno > components, or refer to some external tree that eventually redirects to > the Xenomai tree, which is not acceptable in any case.
Maybe we could add EXTRA_CFLAGS=-I$(TOPDIR)/include/xenomai to every xenomai kernel makefile and to the cflags returned by xeno-config for kernel-space applications ? -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core