Philippe Gerum wrote:
 > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 > > Philippe Gerum wrote:
 > >  > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly 
 > > suspect a bug in 
 > >  > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86
 > > 
 > > Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes a beer to
 > > everyone by first having put a bug in ia64 context-switch code... If I
 > > am not wrong, the bug should be observed on ia64 too. Unfortunately, I
 > > am unable to compile my ia64 kernel right now, so I wrote a patch for
 > > power PC, and would be glad if some power PC owner could try it.
 > > 
 > Nope, same lockup with hybrid scheduling.

The latency -t 1 crash may be observed on ia64 too.

But it does not seem to be due to the bug I was suspecting in context
switch code.


                                            Gilles Chanteperdrix.

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to