in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> We try to find a way to wrap class_device_create properly depending on the
> version Xeno is compiled against. The parent device class argument in this
> (2nd in order) seems to show up in 2.6.15 for kernel.org, but 2.6.14-denx-git
> it too. So we have a problem relying on the version sublevel.
I see. Well, I feel honored, but the reference in such cases should
always be Linus' tree (i. e. the "official" kernel.org tree). Xenomai
cannot and should not have to be considerate of all the N vendor
kernel trees that exist out there in the wild...
And if some user should use our old 2.6.14 tree and run into problems
we can just tell him to use current code - so no problem here,
Please use kernel.org as reference (and remember that decision in
case other vendors should come urging you).
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
- Dennis Ritchie
Xenomai-core mailing list