Dear Philippe,

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> We try to find a way to wrap class_device_create properly depending on the 
> kernel 
> version Xeno is compiled against. The parent device class argument in this 
> call 
> (2nd in order) seems to show up in 2.6.15 for, but 2.6.14-denx-git 
> has 
> it too. So we have a problem relying on the version sublevel.

I see. Well, I feel honored, but the reference in such  cases  should
always be Linus' tree (i. e. the "official" tree). Xenomai
cannot  and  should  not  have  to be considerate of all the N vendor
kernel trees that exist out there in the wild...

And if some user should use our old 2.6.14 tree and run into problems
we can just tell him to use  current  code  -  so  no  problem  here,

Please use as reference (and  remember  that  decision  in
case other vendors should come urging you).

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
                                                     - Dennis Ritchie

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to