Wolfgang Denk wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
We try to find a way to wrap class_device_create properly depending on the kernel
version Xeno is compiled against. The parent device class argument in this call
(2nd in order) seems to show up in 2.6.15 for kernel.org, but 2.6.14-denx-git has
it too. So we have a problem relying on the version sublevel.
I see. Well, I feel honored, but the reference in such cases should
always be Linus' tree (i. e. the "official" kernel.org tree). Xenomai
cannot and should not have to be considerate of all the N vendor
kernel trees that exist out there in the wild...
And if some user should use our old 2.6.14 tree and run into problems
we can just tell him to use current code - so no problem here,
Please use kernel.org as reference (and remember that decision in
case other vendors should come urging you).
Philippe, for some (yet) unknown reasons the trees are not in sync but
they should in respect to include/linux/device.h. Well, lets simply
ignore this problem for Xenomai.
Xenomai-core mailing list