Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> (...)As Xenomai does not support hard-RT signal delivery yet (...)
This is the next feature missing to the POSIX skin. I would like to
implement this, but I am not sure which way to go :
- either, if it is possible, getting Linux signals services to run in
every domain at Adeos level, by replacing spinlocks with spinlocks_hw
and such kind of tricks;
Would be a nightmare, I think. Way too many paths are involved in the
vanilla kernel, and this would be overkill wrt what we want to do.
Actually, what we need is basically exposing the nucleus signal
interface to user-space, and map Linux RT signals over nucleus signals.
Other (non-RT) Linux signals would keep on being handled in secondary
mode the way they are now.
- or adding a generic service at the adeos layer (a hook called when
returning to user-space), building a generic user-space signals
service at the nucleus level, and finally building all posix signals
services on top of this.
A (maybe easier) third option would be to generalize some kind of
pseudo-asynchronous call support, with a worker thread operating on a
dedicated priority level inside applications registering for
asynchronous notifications. The kernel-side would handle the server
wakeups, providing a unified interface for pending on hooks, signals,
watchdogs etc. It would also need to properly multiplex those events
notified from within the skins, and wake up the right pending server in
user-space, which would in turn fire the user provided handler, all in
primary mode. In any case, this would not be more costly latency-wise
than implementing mere callouts, since most of the switching cost comes
from the MMU switch, which we would have to do in both cases, anyway.
The first approach guarantees the best integration with Linux, but
potentially add sections in Linux that are not preemptible by any
Xenomai skin. With the second approach, all services related to signals
have to be reimplemented plus some shortcuts to have standard user-space
tools such as "kill" working.
> What do you think, is it worth including as a POSIX counterpart for
There are a few details that I do not like about this tool, but we may
take it, and fix the details later.
Xenomai-core mailing list