Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly
> > suspect a bug in
> > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86
> > Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes a beer to
> > everyone by first having put a bug in ia64 context-switch code... If I
> > am not wrong, the bug should be observed on ia64 too. Unfortunately, I
> > am unable to compile my ia64 kernel right now, so I wrote a patch for
> > power PC, and would be glad if some power PC owner could try it.
> Nope, same lockup with hybrid scheduling.
The latency -t 1 crash may be observed on ia64 too.
But it does not seem to be due to the bug I was suspecting in context