Hi, I noticed that when an interrupt object is created using rt_intr_create(), it is created disabled, and a call to rt_intr_enable() is necessary for the ISR to be called.
Question is: is this the expected behaviour?. If so, I think this should be mentioned somewhere in the rt_intr_create documentation. In fact, from reading the docs one could infer the opposite. On a related issue, I noticed that the rt_intr_enable() documentation says: "Enables the hardware interrupt line associated with an interrupt object. Over Adeos-based systems which mask and acknowledge IRQs upon receipt, this operation is necessary to revalidate the interrupt channel so that more interrupts from the same source can be notified." Is this correct?. I ask because the rt_intr_create() documentation tells you to just return RT_INTR_ENABLE from the ISR if you want this. It's confusing. Nacho.