Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm getting nmi alarms about latency being > 100 us on a dual P-III 1GHz > > (with and without CONFIG_SMP) once I start the latency test tool. But > > the must be false positive. Can someone comment on this trace: > > > > Issue confirmed here, on a dual 750 Mhz PIII Celeron. Starting the > latency test, the NMI watchdog pulls the break on cpu #0 after a few us, > albeit rthal_nmi_arm() had been told to trigger the NMI more than a > millisecond in the future (likely the HTICK emulation + 100 us NMI > threshold). > > Running a UP + LAPIC enabled kernel on the same hw did not trigger the > spurious NMI, so I'd bet that the issue is SMP related, and not > hw/perfctr related.
I never observe this on my dual PIII whereas I always have the NMI watchdog option enabled. Are you running with or without the tracer ? -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core