Jean-Olivier Villemure wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently working on my diploma thesis which will finish in December > 2006. The first goal of my project is to integrate Xenomai events to > LTTng, a task quite simple since creating new events in LTTng is not > very difficult.
Does this mean we will see a basic but usable LTTng over recent I-pipe/Xenomai soon? I'm only curious... 8) > The second goal is to create a new module in the viewer, > LTTV, to analyse these specifics events. > > Our idea about the LTTV module is to create a new controlflow module > representing realtime task behavior by identifying the start, end, > suspend, resume, period, etc...The difference with the current > controlflow is that we will not be showing the states of the process, > but there will be a line for each task (multiple realtime tasks by > process) and identifiers for each important events. Eventualy it will be > good to detected problems relating to periodic tasks. If I have enough > time, it could also be a good idea to add some statistics. Could such an extension also be interesting for the native real-time Linux project (PREEMPT_RT)? I'm asking because, if yes, you may try to gain input from that community as well (=>LKML). This doesn't mean that you have to implement such support, just keeping the approach open for an integration. Finding and meeting common requirements is always a good thing and can help even more people. > > If you have any idea relating to Xenomai or LTTng/LTTV, I will > considerate them. > > Thank you! > Jean-Olivier Villemure > Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core