Philippe Gerum wrote: > > o A further improvement should be achievable for scenarios 4 and 5 by > > introducing absolute xntimers (more precisely: a flag to > > differentiate between the mode on xntimer_start). I have an outdated > > patch for this in my repos, needs re-basing. > > > > Grmblm... Well, I would have preferred that we don't add that kind of > complexity to the nucleus interface, but I must admit that some > important use cases are definitely better served by absolute timespecs, > so I would surrender to this requirement, provided the implementation is > confined to xnpod_suspend_thread() + xntimer_start().
It would be nice if absolute timeouts were also available when using xnsynch_sleep_on. There are a few use cases in the POSIX skin. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core