On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 14:42 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > o A further improvement should be achievable for scenarios 4 and 5 by > > > introducing absolute xntimers (more precisely: a flag to > > > differentiate between the mode on xntimer_start). I have an outdated > > > patch for this in my repos, needs re-basing. > > > > > > > Grmblm... Well, I would have preferred that we don't add that kind of > > complexity to the nucleus interface, but I must admit that some > > important use cases are definitely better served by absolute timespecs, > > so I would surrender to this requirement, provided the implementation is > > confined to xnpod_suspend_thread() + xntimer_start(). > > It would be nice if absolute timeouts were also available when using > xnsynch_sleep_on. There are a few use cases in the POSIX skin.
Makes sense, since xnpod_suspend_thread() and xnsynch_sleep_on() are tightly integrated interfaces. > -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core