On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 14:42 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>  > >  o A further improvement should be achievable for scenarios 4 and 5 by
>  > >    introducing absolute xntimers (more precisely: a flag to
>  > >    differentiate between the mode on xntimer_start). I have an outdated
>  > >    patch for this in my repos, needs re-basing.
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > Grmblm... Well, I would have preferred that we don't add that kind of
>  > complexity to the nucleus interface, but I must admit that some
>  > important use cases are definitely better served by absolute timespecs,
>  > so I would surrender to this requirement, provided the implementation is
>  > confined to xnpod_suspend_thread() + xntimer_start().
> 
> It would be nice if absolute timeouts were also available when using
> xnsynch_sleep_on. There are a few use cases in the POSIX skin.

Makes sense, since xnpod_suspend_thread() and xnsynch_sleep_on() are
tightly integrated interfaces.

> 
-- 
Philippe.



_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to