The patch works here too. Thanks for looking into this so quickly. I'll switch back to 2.1 until this is resolved.

Vincent Levesque

Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

    > So could anyone test this patch and let me know if it works?
    > Note : I haven't compiled it even as I don't have a proper
    environment. But
    > the changes are pretty simple so it should be ok.
    I just did run the test program supplied by Vincent after applying
    Your patch
    (against 2.2.0)
    It did work !

That's good. Thanks for your assistance.

So synch. message passing interface (IOW, rt_task_send/receive/reply) is mgmglmgmm... slightly broken at the moment for all versions.

The ones who need it may use this patch so far. I'll think a bit more on it in the mean time but I tend to think that "Fixed Ownership" (expressed by XNSYNCH_FOWNER) should really be a property of the synch. object indeed (as in the current patch).

> Only one small typo was in the patch, it is fixed in the attached patch
> version.

Ok, now I need to run diff -u old-patch new-patch to find out this typo :)

Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to