Jan Kiszka wrote: > Sebastian Smolorz wrote: > > The possibility of redefinition was not the main goal here. As you > > mentioned it would be problematic. No, I introduced nanosecs_abs_t and > > nanosecs_rel_t because they are more intuitive and more "speaking" to the > > programmer. The meaning of a variable of such a type is clear at first > > sight. > > Yeah, sounds reasonable to me. Then let's move these typedefs to rtdm.h > and document them as self-explanatory defines of the underlying standard > types, freezing their width and signedness at the same time.
Agreed. > > Actually, this would be useful for the driver API of RTDM as well. That's right. No objections from my side. Sebastian _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core