Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
> > The possibility of redefinition was not the main goal here. As you
> > mentioned it would be problematic. No, I introduced nanosecs_abs_t and
> > nanosecs_rel_t because they are more intuitive and more "speaking" to the
> > programmer. The meaning of a variable of such a type is clear at first
> > sight.
> Yeah, sounds reasonable to me. Then let's move these typedefs to rtdm.h
> and document them as self-explanatory defines of the underlying standard
> types, freezing their width and signedness at the same time.


> Actually, this would be useful for the driver API of RTDM as well.

That's right. No objections from my side.


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to