Philippe Gerum wrote:
> I'd rather keep the number of obscure conditional macros as low as
> possible; we should actually try to reduce them since we have a growing
> number of real and pseudo-archs to support, and those macros tend to
> obfuscate the generic code.
> In the same vein, is there anything we could use in the compatible Adeos
> patch that would unambiguously identify the presence of such support
> without resorting to yet-another-macro like IPIPE_HAVE_SHARED_TIMER_IRQ?
We could decide that ipipe_timer_irq_p() must be implemented as a macro,
and use #ifdef ipipe_timer_irq_p but I thought that #ifdef
IPIPE_HAVE_SHARED_TIMER_IRQ was easier to understand.
Xenomai-core mailing list