Philippe Gerum wrote:
 > I'd rather keep the number of obscure conditional macros as low as
 > possible; we should actually try to reduce them since we have a growing
 > number of real and pseudo-archs to support, and those macros tend to
 > obfuscate the generic code.
 > In the same vein, is there anything we could use in the compatible Adeos
 > patch that would unambiguously identify the presence of such support
 > without resorting to yet-another-macro like IPIPE_HAVE_SHARED_TIMER_IRQ?

We could decide that ipipe_timer_irq_p() must be implemented as a macro,
and use #ifdef ipipe_timer_irq_p but I thought that #ifdef
IPIPE_HAVE_SHARED_TIMER_IRQ was easier to understand.


                                            Gilles Chanteperdrix.

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to