Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> > > Another point: did you run the switchbench test?
> > >
> > > With '-n 100000' I get a sure softlock.
> > Probably the default sampling period of 100 us is too hard for ARM,
> Maybe, but I'm not sure (my PXA runs at 520MHz).
> > Xenomai never gets out of the timer interrupt handler,
> I don't think that's the problem.
> With '-n 1000', everything is fine.
> With '-n 10000', on a non-loaded machine, everything is still fine,
> but on a loaded machine, I get the softlock.
> With '-n 30000' even on an unloaded machine I get a softlock
> most of the time.
> I think I'll go and try to understand what switchbench actually
> does and what happens on that softlock. Then I'll probably come
> back with more questions.
You should try -p 1000. Really.
Xenomai-core mailing list