Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:05 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > [...] > >> To give it a start (and finally establish the infrastructure), I >> copied/reformatted some existing examples and created a simple, >> self-contained build system around them. The directory structure would >> be as I suggested: >> >> /examples/native/... >> /examples/posix/... >> /examples/... >> /examples/rtdm/generic/... >> /examples/rtdm/serial/... >> /examples/rtdm/... >> >> I derived a generic Makefiles from my own one for tests (which was in >> turn derived from previous work by Hannes Mayer). It can compile a given >> list of user space applications and kernel modules (2.4 and 2.6) > > The 2.4 section looks x86-dependent. Compiling out-of-tree modules with > 2.4 over ppc would require a bit more magic to find the actual flags > needed.
It's just the arch-independent set of flags. And, yes, this happens to work for good old x86. :) We have a nice but complex flag catcher in RTnet (I think it was once developed for RTAI), but I really wanted to keep this simple. Still, any patches/hints about additionally required flags for PPC are welcome! > >> against >> some Xenomai installation (make XENO=..., unless xeno-config is already >> in $PATH) or a Xenomai-kernel (make KSRC=...). Moreover, there is simple >> Makefile under /examples just to kick building/cleaning of all subdirs >> at once. >> >> If it's OK for everyone, I would check this into trunk. We could then >> migrate existing demo code and snippets over and add new stuff as it >> pops up, both hopefully with the help of interested users. > > Ok, let's merge this. > Will do. Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core