Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 18:04 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 09:49 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> reading through the I-pipe patch I noticed that there are quite a few
>>>> spin_lock->spin_lock_hw and similar conversions. Having the conversion
>>>> mechanism of the -rt patch in mind, I wrote the attached I-pipe cleanup
>>>> that applies a similar pattern on this issue. Gives more than 10k patch
>>>> size reduction for x86 and a bit more safety against minor variations of
>>>> the patched code. Still, review of the lock usages keeps on being
>>>> required as the lock user could assume running IRQs off while I-pipe may
>>>> not guarantee this.
>>>> The required patch for Xenomai is attached as well.
>>> I definitely like this. Queued for testing, thanks.
>> Small update of the ipipe part: typecasts were missing for the
> I saw this recently, thanks. I'm currently working on 1.6-02, which
> includes the spinlock op selection, and yet-another-rework of the
> interrupt flow. Did anything changed regarding the tracer in the
> attached patch?

Nope, only the linux/spinlock.h should be different (unless I messed
something up). Do you get rejects?

I'm currently preparing to post a few cleanup patches for I-pipe (and
Xenomai). Not a must for -02, but maybe worth a glance. Just a minute...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to