Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At some point in time:
>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2006-09/msg00181.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I started to use exec_prefix and prefix for separating the binaries,
>>>>> libraries and script that need to be installed on the target from the
>>>>> include files, documentation and xeno-config script that need to be
>>>>> installed on the host.
>>>>>
>>>> OK, appears reasonable, though I cannot asses if it's a standard usage.
>>> Do not know either if it is standard, but it may be useful to some users.
>>>
>>>
>>>> What do you suggest as a replacement for $(pkgdatadir) then?
>>>> $(exec_prefix)/share/xenomai? Or where to put the testsuite start scripts?
>>> I am Ok with anything under $(exec_prefix)...
>>>
>>
>> Then you should like -v3: now exec_prefix-based.
> 
> It is Ok for me.
> 

I would apply now, but all my autotool versions I have around seem to be
different from yours. Should I just check-in the source part and leave
the bootstrap run pending until anyone of you can kick it?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to