Dmitry Adamushko escreveu:
I think moderators may comment on your question. I just take an
opportunity to make a minor comment on the papers' content (a part of
Thank you for that.
I would really appreciate if could cite some further parts and comment
I read briefly only the part of your thesis regarding the Xenomai and
RTAI parts (page 4).
Frankly speaking (and based on my humble opinion/knowledge of
Xenomai), the information is badly presented, both historically- and
technically-wise, at the very least.
As far as I know, Xenomai is the evolution of fusion, a parallel project
that cooperated with RTAI. Is that wrong?
Starting from the very first sentence: "Xenomai: Forked from RTAI...".
Yes, I feel I should have done that. I have asked for enlightment in
some topics, but I should really ask for someone here to read it. My
Have you ever (if not publicly then privately) asked somebody from the
list to read/review your papers? I guess, no. But that would
definitely have been a good idea.
Thank you for your input, Dmitry. Hope to have some feedback from other
topics if you don't mind. I would put an errata in the index page that
will link to the articles.
Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você!
Experimente já e veja as novidades.
Xenomai-core mailing list