Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> the "trivial" bugs are fixed already: see #2152 for the reason why >> rt_dev_read timeouts took too long (the timer mode was ignored by >> xnsynch_sleep_on), > > Ok. > >> and I also found a yet invisible bug in >> rtdm_toseq_init that would have picked the wrong time base (#2153). >> > > Using xnpod_current_thread()'s time base in rtdm_toseq_init() will > always pick the master one when called over a secondary mode context, > which according to the doc, is allowed. Is this intended?
rtdm_toseq_init will only be called over primary context, it belongs into the same context as rtdm_mutex_timedlock, rtdm_sem_timeddown, etc.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core