On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:21 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi Philippe,
> >>
> >> the "trivial" bugs are fixed already: see #2152 for the reason why
> >> rt_dev_read timeouts took too long (the timer mode was ignored by
> >> xnsynch_sleep_on),
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> >>  and I also found a yet invisible bug in
> >> rtdm_toseq_init that would have picked the wrong time base (#2153).
> >>
> > 
> > Using xnpod_current_thread()'s time base in rtdm_toseq_init() will
> > always pick the master one when called over a secondary mode context,
> > which according to the doc, is allowed. Is this intended?
> 
> rtdm_toseq_init will only be called over primary context, it belongs
> into the same context as rtdm_mutex_timedlock, rtdm_sem_timeddown, etc.
> 

So the doc needs fixing, I guess.

-- 
Philippe.



_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to