Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> something is inconsistent about CAN_RAW in RT-Socket-CAN compared to >> plain Socket-CAN. Also, the latter doesn't know any CAN_PROTO_xxx unless >> I oversee something. Please have a look. > > There is CAN_PROTO_RAW defined and I have added some time ago CAN_RAW to > rtcan.h to be compatible with Socket-CAN: > > /** Particular CAN protocols > * > * Currently only the RAW protocol is supported. > */ > #define CAN_RAW 0
Yes, I know. But the question remains which way to go for rtcan: Socket-CAN doesn't know CAN_PROTO_*, RT-Socket-CAN comes with CAN_RAW as well now, but having a different value. That should be resolved, on whatever side, IMHO. > >> (I received a private complaint of a user trying to compile rtcan_rtt >> against 2.3.x.) > > The latter definition is missing in 2.3.x, though and compiling > rtcan_rtt.c from the trunk will fail for this reason. I'm going to fix > it later today. Good, thanks, Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
