Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>> something is inconsistent about CAN_RAW in RT-Socket-CAN compared to
>> plain Socket-CAN. Also, the latter doesn't know any CAN_PROTO_xxx unless
>> I oversee something. Please have a look.
> There is CAN_PROTO_RAW defined and I have added some time ago CAN_RAW to
> rtcan.h to be compatible with Socket-CAN:
>   /** Particular CAN protocols
>    *
>    *  Currently only the RAW protocol is supported.
>    */
>   #define CAN_RAW  0

Yes, I know. But the question remains which way to go for rtcan:
Socket-CAN doesn't know CAN_PROTO_*, RT-Socket-CAN comes with CAN_RAW as
well now, but having a different value. That should be resolved, on
whatever side, IMHO.

>> (I received a private complaint of a user trying to compile rtcan_rtt
>> against 2.3.x.)
> The latter definition is missing in 2.3.x, though and compiling
> rtcan_rtt.c from the trunk will fail for this reason. I'm going to fix
> it later today.

Good, thanks,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to