Jan Kiszka wrote: > Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Hi Wolfgang, >>> >>> something is inconsistent about CAN_RAW in RT-Socket-CAN compared to >>> plain Socket-CAN. Also, the latter doesn't know any CAN_PROTO_xxx unless >>> I oversee something. Please have a look. >> There is CAN_PROTO_RAW defined and I have added some time ago CAN_RAW to >> rtcan.h to be compatible with Socket-CAN: >> >> /** Particular CAN protocols >> * >> * Currently only the RAW protocol is supported. >> */ >> #define CAN_RAW 0 > > Yes, I know. But the question remains which way to go for rtcan: > Socket-CAN doesn't know CAN_PROTO_*, RT-Socket-CAN comes with CAN_RAW as > well now, but having a different value. That should be resolved, on > whatever side, IMHO.
Ah, now I understand your concern. CAN_PROTO_RAW actually serves the same purpose then CAN_RAW defining the particular CAN protocol. I'm going to clean it up soon removing CAN_PROTO_RAW and updating the doc. CAN_PROTO_RAW was not used by any application, IIRC. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core