Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> something is inconsistent about CAN_RAW in RT-Socket-CAN compared to
>>> plain Socket-CAN. Also, the latter doesn't know any CAN_PROTO_xxx unless
>>> I oversee something. Please have a look.
>> There is CAN_PROTO_RAW defined and I have added some time ago CAN_RAW to
>> rtcan.h to be compatible with Socket-CAN:
>>
>>   /** Particular CAN protocols
>>    *
>>    *  Currently only the RAW protocol is supported.
>>    */
>>   #define CAN_RAW  0
> 
> Yes, I know. But the question remains which way to go for rtcan:
> Socket-CAN doesn't know CAN_PROTO_*, RT-Socket-CAN comes with CAN_RAW as
> well now, but having a different value. That should be resolved, on
> whatever side, IMHO.

Ah, now I understand your concern. CAN_PROTO_RAW actually serves the 
same purpose then CAN_RAW defining the particular CAN protocol. I'm 
going to clean it up soon removing CAN_PROTO_RAW and updating the doc. 
CAN_PROTO_RAW was not used by any application, IIRC.

Wolfgang.


_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to