Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > > - the posix registry > > > > > > Is it enough to replace 1 << (fd % BITS_PER_LONG) > > > with 1L << (fd % BITS_PER_LONG) ? > > > > > > > Yes, of course! > > But ffs on x86_64 takes an int as argument, not a long. So, my best > option is to replace BITS_PER_LONG with 32 and work with ints instead of > longs.
Or we switch to __ffs, which operates on ulong.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
