Le 11/5/2007, "Jan Kiszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: >CHABAL David wrote: >>>> In additional: >>>> 1. You should use 921600 value instead of 912.600. >> >> The "." was here for reading facility only, I consider it as an integer >> in my computations. > >The point was not the point, but the flipped digits. > >> >>> (921600 + (115200 div 2)) div 115200 = 8 >>> >>> So back to square #1: misconfiguration? David, please check with the >>> correct baud base again if you still see relevant divider variations. >>> >> >> moxa: 921600/115200 = 8 (not 7, I apologize for this mistake but we >> guess here that the baud base is always 921600 and according to the >> mxser file it can be 230400 for some cards) > >(230400+57600)/115200=2,5 => 2 > >230400/115200=2 > >???
Oupsss, I'm beaten :-( The only case with a different value that I found is for 1200: (230400+1200)/1200 = 193 230400/1200 = 192 I think it's not relevant for this speed. David > >> >> xeno: (921600+57600)/115200 = 8.5 rounded to 8 > >So we have the same results for both formulas and I don't see the need >for a patch anymore. Do you? Otherwise I would just commit the >div-by-zero fix to trunk now and keep the rest as is. > >Jan > _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
