Jan Kiszka wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> >>>So, Ok, I will try to do something for x86 (either reduce the numbers of >>>registers used by the C code, or reduce the assembly to the bare >>>minimum). But, please, pick my generic implementation of llmulshft, it >>>was carefully written. >> >>Yes, it is the better choice for 32 bit archs (my previous tests didn't >>reflect the usage in Xenomai truely, redoing them made my generic >>version fall behind yours). Will include it. > > > Done, see -v6. Then I added that two-liner for x86_64 rthal_llmulshft, > fixed the BITS_PER_LONG bug, and enabled generic-based support for ARM > (testing welcome!). > > At this chance: My series now also includes rthal_llimd for x86_64, > another two-liner.
v6 is not in the download area. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core