Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> >>>> So, Ok, I will try to do something for x86 (either reduce the numbers of >>>> registers used by the C code, or reduce the assembly to the bare >>>> minimum). But, please, pick my generic implementation of llmulshft, it >>>> was carefully written. >>> Yes, it is the better choice for 32 bit archs (my previous tests didn't >>> reflect the usage in Xenomai truely, redoing them made my generic >>> version fall behind yours). Will include it. >> >> Done, see -v6. Then I added that two-liner for x86_64 rthal_llmulshft, >> fixed the BITS_PER_LONG bug, and enabled generic-based support for ARM >> (testing welcome!). >> >> At this chance: My series now also includes rthal_llimd for x86_64, >> another two-liner. > > v6 is not in the download area. >
Mpf, forgot to press "update". Done.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core