Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, Ok, I will try to do something for x86 (either reduce the numbers of
>>>> registers used by the C code, or reduce the assembly to the bare
>>>> minimum). But, please, pick my generic implementation of llmulshft, it
>>>> was carefully written.
>>> Yes, it is the better choice for 32 bit archs (my previous tests didn't
>>> reflect the usage in Xenomai truely, redoing them made my generic
>>> version fall behind yours). Will include it.
>>
>> Done, see -v6. Then I added that two-liner for x86_64 rthal_llmulshft,
>> fixed the BITS_PER_LONG bug, and enabled generic-based support for ARM
>> (testing welcome!).
>>
>> At this chance: My series now also includes rthal_llimd for x86_64,
>> another two-liner.
> 
> v6 is not in the download area.
> 

Mpf, forgot to press "update". Done.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to