On 21/06/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Unfortunately, that whole thing make me meditate about the whole issue
> again. And now I wonder why we make such a fuss about locking for shared
> IRQs (where it should be correct with any of the new patches) while we
> do not care about the non-shared, standard scenario.
surprise-surprise.. sure, one way or another it must be fixed. heh..
too many bugs (and I don't even want to say who's responsible) :-/
> Sigh, the never ending IRQ story...
should be reviewed.
Xenomai-core mailing list