Jan Kiszka wrote:
 > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 > > IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply
 > > the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we
 > > need is:
 > > - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol which set this flag and
 > >   unshare the target timebase if it is shared (IOW, if aperiodic)
 > > - the service xntbase_adjust_time to walk all the absolute timers of the
 > >   non isolated timebases and adjust their expiry date or play their
 > >   handler the posix way.
 > 
 > Two questions came up here regarding item #2:
 > 
 >  - Shouldn't we also adjust the non-monotonic timers of an isolated base
 >    if it asks for wallclock tuning? I think so.
 > 
 >  - We don't have a service to walk the list of all pending timers, do
 >    we? As that touches all of our timer queue variants and I'm not
 >    familiar with their details (except for plain lists...), I would
 >    welcome any support on this.

I am afraid for other things than lists, we will have to define an
xntimerq_iterator which holds a little bit more information than just a
pointer to a holder.

-- 


                                            Gilles Chanteperdrix.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to