Daniel Simon wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:56:09 +0200
> Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Let's find a compromise: I will try to role out -v2 of this patch with
>> your fixes soon. And you will try to do the in-depth tests of exectime
>> reporting once you have a Xenomai box again? Hacking is cheap, testing
>> takes the time... :) Or does the test code you once submitted report
>> clear results /wrt the correctness of the exectime data?
> What I mean is that I can perform tests _only on a Pentium3 UP_, and on this
> machine I upto now get consistent results on the basic tests using the last
> fixes (and I will do further testing with various applications).

Ah, ok, /me should have read more thoroughly.

> I cannot (and will not be able in a previsible future) perform tests
> neither on a SMP nor on not_i386 architectures...
> In attachment: 
> the full exectime-V2.patch (including all the fixes we discussed
> today) against a vanilla 2758 release, which compiled and behaves well on my
> basic examples and UP machine. (it also patches with no hunk against
> last release 2764), 
> and the add-on against your original patch (I don't know what
> is the easiest way for you...)

I've merge you changes (whitespaces...), reformatted it a bit, and
uploaded the result. See


Hope I didn't messed anything up, it was just compile-tested in a hurry.
If the patch happens to work fine, I would start advertising it for
merge into trunk.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to