Philippe Gerum wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 17:32 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>   
>> On 9/3/07, Ravid Baruch Naali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello again,
>>>       
>> Hi,
>>
>>     
>>> I'm not sure what is the preferred way to commit my changes, so before I
>>> commit i'm Attaching my patch in order to get you remarks and further
>>> instructions
>>>       
>> The synchronization on tasks completion with the semID semaphore seems
>> broken. The main thread will get the semahore when the first task
>> completes, not when all the tasks complete.
>>
>> I see too many comments, for instance:
>> // Checking for failures
>> if (error == ERROR)
>>
>> is useless, it is pretty obvious from reading the code that you are
>> checking for failure. Comments should tell us things that are not
>> obvious.
>>
>> Now, about the style, this is C code, so use C style comments. I would
>> also prefer that you use the kernel coding style, but this is not
>> kernel code, so I am not sure the rule is to use the kernel coding
>> style.
>>     
>
> It is. We do want a common style regardless of the execution space. TIA,
>
>   
Thanks for the comments I'll adapt and fix it before I'll send it again.


-- 
Ravid Baruch Naali
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972 4 6732729
+972 52 5830021


_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to