Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>>> And a third >>>>>>> one only gives me "Detected illicit call from domain Xenomai" before the >>>>>>> box reboots. :( >>>>>> Grmff... Do you run with your smp_processor_id() instrumentation in? >>>>> Yes, but I suspect this is just a symptom of some severe memory >>>>> corruption that (also?) hits I-pipe data structures. I just put in some >>>>> different instrumentation, and that warning is gone, the box just hangs >>>>> hard at a different point. Very unfriendly. >>>> Hah! Got some crash log by hacking a raw printk-to-uart: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> <6>Xenomai: starting RTDM services. >>>> <6>NET: Registered protocol family 10 >>>> <6>lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions >>>> <6>ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready >>>> <3>I-pipe: Detected illicit call from domain 'Xenomai' >>>> <3> into a service reserved for domain 'Linux' and below. >>>> f3a6bc18 00000000 00000000 c05dad6c f3a6bc3c c0105fc3 c03513c7 >>>> c05dc100 >>>> 00000009 f3a6bc54 c01479cb c03592f8 c0357ae2 c035e069 f3a6bc88 >>>> f3a6bc70 >>>> c0127224 c0111df8 00000000 f3a6bd74 00000000 f3a6bd74 f3a6bc80 >>>> c012727f >>>> Call Trace: >>>> [<c010520f>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1f/0x40 >>>> [<c01052e1>] show_stack_log_lvl+0xb1/0xe0 >>>> [<c0105fc3>] show_stack+0x33/0x40 >>>> [<c01479cb>] ipipe_check_context+0x7b/0x90 >>>> [<c0127224>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x60 >>>> [<c012727f>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1f/0x30 >>>> [<c0131e02>] notify_die+0x32/0x40 >>>> [<c0105d29>] do_invalid_op+0x59/0xa0 >>>> [<c0111d0b>] __ipipe_handle_exception+0x7b/0x144 >>>> [<c02dfaeb>] error_code+0x6f/0x7c >>> Wow. Why that? >>> >>>> [<c0111d13>] __ipipe_handle_exception+0x83/0x144 >>>> [<c02dfaeb>] error_code+0x6f/0x7c >>> And this? We should not get any exception over an IPI3 handler. I guess >>> the double fault may be explained by this root cause. >>> >>>> [<c01117df>] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x4f/0x140 >>>> [<c0104c5e>] ipipe_ipi3+0x26/0x40 >>> Our LAPIC timer vector. Are you running full modular or statically btw? >> Fully modular. Compiling the nucleus in makes the lock-up move to >> another, once again invisible spot. >> >> I nailed down the fault address in the scenario above. It's in the >> nucleus module, at the first byte of xntimer_tick_aperiodic. Are we >> loosing module text pages over the time? This functions must have been >> executed before as the timer was armed while I collected the >> /proc/modules and then triggered the crash. > > There is a pending issue about vmalloced areas, which I completely forgot: > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2007-02/msg00138.html >
Ooops. By reading all my mails, I would have avoided reinventing this wheel on my own. Your patch is almost what I posted yesterday to fix the vmalloc issue. Looks like we no longer need the last hunk of it on recent kernels, right? Jan PS: We should really consider using bug trackers for Adeos and Xenomai! I have a few (minor) patches hanging around as well, but things quickly get lost when bigger problems pop up.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core