Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Dear Xeonmai/I-Pipe maintainers,
> 
> Attached is an obvious patch (to me). Part of it is across I-Pipe.
> Is there a reason why the counter was declared signed?
> 

Well, because the number of faults was not expected to increase
indefinitely... Is it the PF count we are talking about, on a mpc85xx?

> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xenomai-core mailing list
> Xenomai-core@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


-- 
Philippe.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to