Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Dear Xeonmai/I-Pipe maintainers,
> Attached is an obvious patch (to me). Part of it is across I-Pipe.
> Is there a reason why the counter was declared signed?

Well, because the number of faults was not expected to increase
indefinitely... Is it the PF count we are talking about, on a mpc85xx?

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Xenomai-core mailing list


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to