Fillod Stephane wrote: > Dear Xeonmai/I-Pipe maintainers, > > Attached is an obvious patch (to me). Part of it is across I-Pipe. > Is there a reason why the counter was declared signed? >
Well, because the number of faults was not expected to increase indefinitely... Is it the PF count we are talking about, on a mpc85xx? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
