Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
 > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
 > >  > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 > >  > > Would not it be simpler to put a pointer to the task_struct ? After 
all,
 > >  > > it already has a pid, comm and mm, and a file descriptor will not
 > >  > > survive a task_struct thanks to automatic closing of file descriptors.
> > > > > > Hmm, hmm, hmmmm... Sounds reasonable, should be safe. > > > > Actually no, we can not do that because a task_struct may well disappear
 > > and the rtdm_process continue to exist as long as another thread uses the
 > > same mm.
> > Because we cleanup on mm exit, not task exit, right? OK, looks like I > originally spent a few more thoughts than this time :-/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you
 > >  > >  > live without the check until we have per-process fd tabled, or was 
it
 > >  > >  > essential for the select thing?
> > > > > > > > An application which I ported to Xenomai (and which uses the select
 > >  > > call) closes all file descriptors in a for loop. The purpose of this
 > >  > > loop is, I guess, to avoid leaving a file descriptor opened that was
 > >  > > passed through exec.
> > > > > > OK. > > > > > > So, will you change rtdm_process too? Thanks. > > > > I commited the select support, without any change to rtdm_context_get or
 > > rtdm_process. So, now, how do you prefer this to be fixed, by adding an
 > > mm struct to the rtdm_process struct ? By the way, after thinking about
 > > it I can live without this fix: I just have to stop the loop closing
 > > file descriptors at 768, so that it will not try to close RTDM file
 > > descriptors.
> > If you can live with it, I would vote for fixing it by the intended > redesign via per-process fds.

Ok.

> > > > > While commiting the support for select, I also had a dependency problem
 > > in Kconfig: when support for posix select is enabled the posix module
 > > uses a function defined in the RTDM module. So, there is one invalid
 > > configuration: posix built-in with support for select and rtdm built as
 > > a module. I could not find a way to express this condition in the
 > > Kconfig language, so I just made a comment depend on this condition, but
 > > would be happy if anyone found a better solution.
> > I would say: > > config POSIX
 >   select RTDM if OPT_SELECT

But in this case, I can not have posix with select and without rtdm.

Then you need to isolate those services that POSIX needs from RTDM. The above just expresses the dependency you described. In the end this just shows that we have to define the common fd-ground for both skins in the core.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to