Jan Kiszka wrote:
> As the #ifdef forest was cut down, I once again looked at xnlock_put.
> Why do you have this safety check for the owner also in production code?
Because only one broken xnlock_put could entail a chain reaction of
broken xnlock sections with code on multiple CPU violating critical
sections. With the test, we prevent the chain reaction. But I agree this
check should not be silent.
Xenomai-core mailing list