On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Ulrich Schwab wrote:
>>> why not checking for irq origin like this:
>>> int my_isr_handler (xnintr_t *irq)
>>> {
>>>  if ( ! test_my_card_for_irq_origin )
>>>     return XN_ISR_NONE | XN_ISR_PROPAGATE;
>>>   ... /* handling */
>>>  return XN_ISR_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> this way XN_ISR_PROPAGATE is never returned in the not-shared case.
>>
>> I think this idea needs an answer; the answer is no: it will not work.
>> Because the IRQ will remain masked until Linux handles it, which
>> basically means that the RT irq will wait for non-RT activity, you loose
>> real-time response.
>
> It will not work, but not for the reason I mention: Adeos WILL re-enable
> the IRQ at interrupt controller level after the end of this handler,
> however, since the interrupt was not cleared on the peripheral side, the
> peripheral will reassert the interrupt when the interrupt is unmasked at
> interrupt controller level, so the CPU will enter an infinite loop
> invoking the ISR.
>
> --
>                                                 Gilles.
>
Are You sure?
IIRC the infinte loop You describe occurs when XN_ISR_PROPAGATE is
removed from the code above.


Ulrich

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to