Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> ...and also automatically fixes the missing LOCK prefix for
>>> pthread_mutex_* services on x86_32 SMP.
>> This looks to me as a half-way unification. Can we not totally get rid
>> of atomic_32.h and atomic_64.h ? I mean since we are using unsigned long
>> as atomic_t on both platforms, there should not be much difference
>> (except maybe the inline asm).
> I could merge all atomic_32/64.h hunks into atomic.h if that this
> preferred, but I cannot help getting rid of the atomic_t vs. atomic64_t
> differences, thus the sub-arch specific part cannot be reduced as far as
> I see it ATM.

We could use atomic_long_t on the two arches.


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to