Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> ...and also automatically fixes the missing LOCK prefix for >>> pthread_mutex_* services on x86_32 SMP. >> This looks to me as a half-way unification. Can we not totally get rid >> of atomic_32.h and atomic_64.h ? I mean since we are using unsigned long >> as atomic_t on both platforms, there should not be much difference >> (except maybe the inline asm). >> > > I could merge all atomic_32/64.h hunks into atomic.h if that this > preferred, but I cannot help getting rid of the atomic_t vs. atomic64_t > differences, thus the sub-arch specific part cannot be reduced as far as > I see it ATM.
We could use atomic_long_t on the two arches. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core