Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Ok. Though I do not see the point of the FASTSEM/FASTSYNCH rename.
> FASTSEM is short, and we are not much interested in getting anything
> else than semaphores faster.

We aren't optimizing semaphores (at least not yet), we are optimizing
mutexes only. And if we ever optimize also semaphores, FASTSYNCH will
luckily still fit. :)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to