Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Same remark for the #ifdefs.
Yes, but most cases (maybe except for owner checking) are unavoidable due to heavy differences. I hope that we may have only FASTXNSYCH archs one day. > I also do not understand your modification > of rt_cond_wait_inner, this code is very tense; posix and native had the > same bug in this area at different times, so this change should probably > be made separately. Which modification precisely (damn, I need to find out what makes quilt cause this attachment confusion)? Note that lockcnt tracking changed with this patch: the lock owner himself is in charge of maintaining it, not some thread handing the lock over. That said, I would happily analyse the case that broke before. I will also check if I can break out the lockcnt maintenance change, but I think to recall that it was coupled to the fast path changes. Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core