Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> @@ -192,6 +192,9 @@ static void *__pthread_trampoline(void *arg)
>>>>>  
>>>>>   param.sched_priority = iargs->prio;
>>>>>   policy = iargs->policy;
>>>>> + if (policy == SCHED_RR)
>>>>> +         /* Restrict round-robin scheduling to the Xenomai domain. */
>>>>> +         policy = SCHED_FIFO;
>>>> Should not there be the same thing in __wrap_pthread_setschedparam ?
>>> Yes, and setschedparam_ex, here we go:
>> Actually, I am wondering if we can not get rid of these calls to
>> __real_pthread_setschedparam, now that propagating kernel-space priority
>> to user-space is done by a signal ?
> 
> Not with the existing code, as that only forwards prio changes, but no
> policy changes.

If we map SCHED_RR to SCHED_FIFO, are there any policy changes?

-- 
                                                 Gilles.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to