> Not explicitly specified, but the existing timer will be stopped first
> and then newly started.

I should see if we are doing that, then. We are loading bytes into a  
buffer and calling start if we need to call it. Perhaps the logic is  

> "...start ... in 2 ms" sounds a bit like TIMERMODE_RELATIVE, no? :)

Yes I made this same mistake when I first wrote the driver. The  
version we are having issues with does say RELATIVE. I am still  
adjusting to a new time zone, so I use that as my excuse. :)


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to