Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> Obviously a conversion error while switching to __xn_safe*. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >>>> Well, I have just checked the kernel code, and 0 as a return value of >>>> strncpy_from_user is treated as a value in most places, even if not >>>> -EFAULT. >>>> >>> Better check our code: :) __xn_safe_strncpy_from_user works differently. >> Then I would tend to consider that xn_safe_strncpy is broken. > > No, because it not a derivate of strncpy_from_user, but an internal > service optimized for the most common use cases (where you don't care > about the precise return value).
So, what should I call if I care about the return value ? -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core