Steven Seeger wrote:
> Per Gilles's suggestion, Mark at Stellartech ran latency and klatency
> with the TSC enabled "the hack" and without the TSC enabled. He also
> posted the CPU task measurements with our app running without the
> hack, which is horrible compared to when the TSC is on.
> It looks like we are better off with the TSC. The worst case is much
> better, anyway.
I do not understand these results. In the "nohack" case, is
CONFIG_X86_TSC enabled ? In this case, you should not observe any
Xenomai-core mailing list